Sony Cyber-shot WX350 vs Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II Compare

Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.

Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.

Cyber-shot WX350 vs DMC FZ1000 II - Side by side

Learn more about compared cameras specifications below.

Sony Cyber-shot WX350 vs Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II Specs

Cyber-shot WX350

  • Introduced in February 2014
  • Superzoom
  • Sensor: Compact
  • 18 megapixel
  • 10 frames/second
  • 100 - 12800 ISO
  • 1920 x 1080 Video
  • No viewfinder
  • 75.00mm (3.0") Monitor
  • Zoom 24-480mm (20x), f3.5-6.5
  • WiFi built-in
  • 96 x 54.9 x 25.7mm³ (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0")
  • 137g (4.4 oz.)

All specs: Main page for Cyber-shot WX350

DMC FZ1000 II

  • Introduced in February 2019
  • Superzoom
  • Sensor: 1"
  • 20 megapixel
  • 12 frames/second
  • 125 - 12800 ISO
  • 4096 x 2160 Video
  • Viewfinder: Elektronic
  • 75.00mm (3.0") Monitor, articulated
  • Zoom 24-400mm (17x), f2.8-4.0
  • WiFi built-in
  • 136 x 97.2 x 131.5mm³ (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2")
  • 810g (26.1 oz.)

All specs: Main page for DMC FZ1000 II

Cyber-shot WX350 vs DMC FZ1000 II: The sensors

The Cyber-shot WX350 features a Compact sized sensor, while the DMC FZ1000 II uses a 1" sensor.

Featuring an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.), the DMC FZ1000 II's sensor is a lot larger that the chip that the Cyber-shot WX350 employs at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). A larger sensor can produce images of interiors or at night that have less noise and better contrast than photos shot with Compact sized chips.

Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II

Sony Cyber-shot WX350 VS Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II Other Specs Comparison

Why is Sony Cyber-shot WX350 a better choice

Cyber-shot WX350

DMC FZ1000 II

Better sensibility (4)100 - 12800 ISO125 - 12800 ISO
Longer battery life (3, photos)470440
Weighs less (2)137g
(4.4 oz.)
810g
(26.1 oz.)
More portable (2)135cm³
(9 cu.in.)
1738cm³
(110 cu.in.)

Conclusion: Advantages of the Cyber-shot WX350 are the larger sensitivity, that the battery has more stamina and the lower weight than the DMC FZ1000 II. Another advantage over the DMC FZ1000 II: the more compact size.

The Cyber-shot WX350 scores 11 points.

Otherwise why to choose Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II

Cyber-shot WX350

DMC FZ1000 II

Larger sensor (5)Compact1"
Wider resolution (5, megapixel)18.2020.10
Higher speed (4, frames/second)1012
Auto Focus points (4)149
Better monitor (2, Megapixel)0.461.24
Articulated monitor (2)
Touch screen (2)
Better Video (2)1920 x 10804096 x 2160
External microphone (2)

Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ1000 II are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and that the camera is faster. Additional pros for the Panasonic are the faster and more accurate auto focus, that the display has a higher resolution and the articulated display. A recommendation of the DMC FZ1000 II is made easy by the rather comfortable touch screen, the superior video recording and the connector for an external microphone.

Yields 28 points for the DMC FZ1000 II.

Common Specs for both cameras compared

Cyber-shot WX350

DMC FZ1000 II

Built-in flash
Image stabilizer
WiFi
Sony Cyber-shot WX350 VS Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II Dimensions

Look at front view of the Cyber-shot WX350 and DMC FZ1000 II

Cyber-shot WX350 und DMC FZ1000 II, front viewCyber-shot WX350 und DMC FZ1000 II, front view

Top view of cameras

Cyber-shot WX350 und DMC FZ1000 II, view from aboveCyber-shot WX350 und DMC FZ1000 II, view from above

Total scores

Here's the total score according to comparison above:

Sony Cyber-shot WX350

Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II

11
28

We recommend Panasonic DMC FZ1000 II as better choice.

Visual data, advantage info and scores © 2019 PalCamerasWest.com. All rights reserved.