Nikon Coolpix B600 vs Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Compare

Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.

Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.

Coolpix B600 vs DMC FZ2000 - Side by side

Learn more about compared cameras specifications below.

Nikon Coolpix B600 vs Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Specs

Coolpix B600

  • Introduced in January 2019
  • Superzoom
  • Sensor: Compact
  • 16 megapixel
  • 7 frames/second
  • 125 - 6400 ISO
  • 1920 x 1080 Video
  • No viewfinder
  • 75.00mm (3.0") Monitor
  • Zoom 24-1440mm (60x), f3.3-6.5
  • WiFi built-in
  • 121.6 x 81.5 x 99.2mm³ (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.9")
  • 500g (16.1 oz.)

All specs: Main page for Coolpix B600

DMC FZ2000

  • Introduced in September 2016
  • Superzoom
  • Sensor: 1"
  • 20 megapixel
  • 12 frames/second
  • 125 - 12800 ISO
  • 4096 x 2160 Video
  • Viewfinder: Elektronic
  • 75.00mm (3.0") Monitor, articulated
  • Zoom 24-480mm (20x), f2.8-4.5
  • WiFi built-in
  • 137.6 x 101.9 x 134.7mm³ (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3")
  • 966g (31.2 oz.)

All specs: Main page for DMC FZ2000

Coolpix B600 vs DMC FZ2000: The sensors

The Coolpix B600 features a Compact sized sensor, while the DMC FZ2000 uses a 1" sensor.

Featuring an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.), the DMC FZ2000's sensor is a lot larger that the chip that the Coolpix B600 employs at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). A larger sensor can produce images of interiors or at night that have less noise and better contrast than photos shot with Compact sized chips.

Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ2000

Nikon Coolpix B600 VS Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Other Specs Comparison

Why is Nikon Coolpix B600 a better choice

Coolpix B600

DMC FZ2000

Weighs less (2)500g
(16.1 oz.)
966g
(31.2 oz.)
More portable (2)983cm³
(62 cu.in.)
1889cm³
(119 cu.in.)

Conclusion: Advantages of the Coolpix B600 are the lower weight than the DMC FZ2000 and the more compact size.

The Coolpix B600 scores 4 points.

Otherwise why to choose Panasonic DMC FZ2000

Coolpix B600

DMC FZ2000

Larger sensor (5)Compact1"
Wider resolution (5, megapixel)16.0020.10
Higher speed (4, frames/second)712
Auto Focus points (4)149
Better sensibility (4)125 - 6400 ISO125 - 12800 ISO
Better monitor (2, Megapixel)0.921.04
Articulated monitor (2)
Touch screen (2)
Better Video (2)1920 x 10804096 x 2160
External microphone (2)
Longer battery life (3, photos)280350

Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ2000 are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and that the camera is faster. Additional pros for the Panasonic are the faster and more accurate auto focus, the larger sensitivity and that the display has a higher resolution. A nice touch is the articulated display, the rather comfortable touch screen and the superior video recording. A recommendation of the DMC FZ2000 is made easy by the connector for an external microphone and that the battery has more stamina.

Yields 35 points for the DMC FZ2000.

Common Specs for both cameras compared

Coolpix B600

DMC FZ2000

Built-in flash
Image stabilizer
WiFi
Nikon Coolpix B600 VS Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Dimensions

Look at front view of the Coolpix B600 and DMC FZ2000

Coolpix B600 und DMC FZ2000, front viewCoolpix B600 und DMC FZ2000, front view

Top view of cameras

Coolpix B600 und DMC FZ2000, view from aboveCoolpix B600 und DMC FZ2000, view from above

Total scores

Here's the total score according to comparison above:

Nikon Coolpix B600

Panasonic DMC FZ2000

4
35

We recommend Panasonic DMC FZ2000 as better choice.

Visual data, advantage info and scores © 2019 PalCamerasWest.com. All rights reserved.