Learn more about compared cameras specifications below.
Leica Q-P vs Nikon DL 24-500 Specs
All specs: Main page for Q-P
All specs: Main page for DL 24-500
Q-P vs DL 24-500 Sensors
On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted.This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats:
Note: 1-Euro coin for scale; the coin at 23.25mm diameter is slightly smaller than a US quarter.
Boasting an area of 864mm² (1.38 sq.in.) the sensor of the Q-P is a lot larger than the DL 24-500's chip at 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.). In most cases a larger sensor will yield better results in low light, a considerable advantage in many situations (e.g. interior images), a clear disadvantage of the 1" format.
Better choice: Leica Q-P
Q-P vs DL 24-500: Viewfinder
Q-P has an electronic viewfinder and it's resolution is 3.68 megapixel with magnification of 0.70x.
DL 24-500 has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it's magnification is 0.70x.
Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x.
DL 24-500 (0.70x)
Better choice: Draw
Leica Q-P VS Nikon DL 24-500 Other Specs Comparison
Why is Leica Q-P a better choice
|Larger sensor (5)||Full frame||1"|
|Wider resolution (5, megapixel)||24.20||20.80|
|Better sensibility (4)||100 - 50000 ISO||160 - 12800 ISO|
|Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel)||3.68||2.36|
|Longer battery life (3, photos)||300||290|
|Weighs less (2)||640g|
|More portable (2)||967cm³|
Conclusion: Advantages of the Q-P are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and the larger sensitivity. We also like the better viewfinder, that the battery has more stamina and the lower weight than the DL 24-500. Another advantage over the DL 24-500: the more compact size.
The Q-P scores 25 points.
Otherwise why to choose Nikon DL 24-500
|Higher speed (4, frames/second)||10||20|
|Auto Focus points (4)||49||105|
|Built-in flash (2)|
|Image stabilizer (3)|
|Articulated monitor (2)|
|Better Video (2)||1920 x 1080||3840 x 2160|
|External microphone (2)|
Conclusion: Advantages of the DL 24-500 are that the camera is faster, the faster and more accurate auto focus and the built-in flash. A nice touch is the optical image stabilizer, the articulated display and the superior video recording. A recommendation of the DL 24-500 is made easy by the connector for an external microphone.
Yields 19 points for the DL 24-500.
Common Specs for both cameras compared
|Sensor resolution (MP)||1.04||1.04|
|Leica Q-P VS Nikon DL 24-500 Dimensions|
Look at front view of the Q-P and DL 24-500
Top view of cameras
Here's the total score according to comparison above:
Nikon DL 24-500
We recommend Leica Q-P as better choice.
Visual data, advantage info and scores © 2019 PalCamerasWest.com. All rights reserved.
|1||Nikon Coolpix P1000||125x|
|2||Nikon Coolpix P900||83x|
|3||Canon PowerShot SX70 HS||65x|
|4||Canon PowerShot SX60 HS||65x|
|5||Panasonic DC FZ82||60x|
|6||Nikon Coolpix B600||60x|
|7||Nikon Coolpix B700||60x|
|8||Nikon Coolpix P610||60x|
|9||Canon PowerShot SX540 HS||50x|
|10||Canon PowerShot SX420 IS||42x|