Fujifilm X-T30 vs Sony NEX 3N Compare

Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.

Cameras which are being compared are Mirrorless cameras.

X-T30 vs NEX 3N - Side by side

Learn more about compared cameras specifications below.

Fujifilm X-T30 vs Sony NEX 3N Specs

X-T30

  • Introduced in February 2019
  • Mirrorless
  • Sensor: APS-C
  • 26 megapixel
  • 8 frames/second
  • 200 - 12800 ISO
  • 3840 x 2160 Video
  • Viewfinder: Elektronic
  • 76.00mm (3.0") Monitor, articulated
  • Lens mount X-Bajonett
  • WiFi built-in
  • 118.4 x 82.8 x 46.8mm³ (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.8")
  • 383g (12.4 oz.)

All specs: Main page for X-T30

NEX 3N

  • Introduced in February 2013
  • Mirrorless
  • Sensor: APS-C
  • 16 megapixel
  • 3 frames/second
  • 200 - 16000 ISO
  • 1920 x 1080 Video
  • No viewfinder
  • 75.00mm (3.0") Monitor, articulated
  • Lens mount E Mount
  • No WiFi
  • 109.6 x 62.0 x 35.7mm³ (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4")
  • 210g (6.8 oz.)

All specs: Main page for NEX 3N

X-T30 vs NEX 3N Sensors

On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted.

This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats:

Info graphic: X-T30 an NEX 3N sensor comparison

Fujifilm X-T30 VS Sony NEX 3N Other Specs Comparison

Why is Fujifilm X-T30 a better choice

X-T30

NEX 3N

Sensor cleaning (3)
Wider resolution (5, megapixel)26.1016.10
Higher speed (4, frames/second)83
Auto Focus points (4)42525
Better monitor (2, Megapixel)1.040.46
Touch screen (2)
Better Video (2)3840 x 21601920 x 1080
External microphone (2)
WiFi (2)

Conclusion: Advantages of the X-T30 are built-in automatic sensor cleaning, the higher resolution and that the camera is faster. Additional pros for the Fujifilm are the faster and more accurate auto focus, that the display has a higher resolution and the rather comfortable touch screen. A recommendation of the X-T30 is made easy by the superior video recording, the connector for an external microphone and the built-in wifi that permits remote shooting and image transfer without the need for a cable connection.

The X-T30 scores 26 points.

Otherwise why to choose Sony NEX 3N

X-T30

NEX 3N

Better sensibility (4)200 - 12800 ISO200 - 16000 ISO
Larger lens selection (3)2550
Longer battery life (3, photos)380400
Weighs less (2)383g
(12.4 oz.)
210g
(6.8 oz.)
More portable (2)459cm³
(29 cu.in.)
243cm³
(15 cu.in.)

Conclusion: Advantages of the NEX 3N are the larger sensitivity, the larger selection of lenses and that the battery has more stamina. Another advantage over the X-T30: the lower weight than the X-T30 and the more compact size.

Yields 14 points for the NEX 3N.

Common Specs for both cameras compared

X-T30

NEX 3N

Sensor formatAPS-CAPS-C
Built-in flash
Articulated screen
Fujifilm X-T30 VS Sony NEX 3N Dimensions

Look at front view of the X-T30 and NEX 3N

X-T30 und NEX 3N, front viewX-T30 und NEX 3N, front view

Top view of cameras

X-T30 und NEX 3N, view from aboveX-T30 und NEX 3N, view from above

Total scores

Here's the total score according to comparison above:

Fujifilm X-T30

Sony NEX 3N

26
14

We recommend Fujifilm X-T30 as better choice.

Visual data, advantage info and scores © 2019 PalCamerasWest.com. All rights reserved.