Fujifilm X-T3 vs Sony NEX 3N Compare

Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.

Cameras which are being compared are Mirrorless cameras.

X-T3 vs NEX 3N - Side by side

Learn more about compared cameras specifications below.

Fujifilm X-T3 vs Sony NEX 3N Specs

X-T3

  • Introduced in September 2018
  • Mirrorless
  • Sensor: APS-C
  • 26 megapixel
  • 20 frames/second
  • 160 - 12800 ISO
  • 3840 x 2160 Video
  • Viewfinder: Elektronic
  • 76.00mm (3.0") Monitor, articulated
  • Lens mount X-Bajonett
  • WiFi built-in
  • 132.5 x 92.8 x 58.8mm³ (5.2" x 3.7" x 2.3")
  • 539g (17.4 oz.)

All specs: Main page for X-T3

NEX 3N

  • Introduced in February 2013
  • Mirrorless
  • Sensor: APS-C
  • 16 megapixel
  • 3 frames/second
  • 200 - 16000 ISO
  • 1920 x 1080 Video
  • No viewfinder
  • 75.00mm (3.0") Monitor, articulated
  • Lens mount E Mount
  • No WiFi
  • 109.6 x 62.0 x 35.7mm³ (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4")
  • 210g (6.8 oz.)

All specs: Main page for NEX 3N

X-T3 vs NEX 3N Sensors

On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted.

This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats:

Info graphic: X-T3 an NEX 3N sensor comparison

Fujifilm X-T3 VS Sony NEX 3N Other Specs Comparison

Why is Fujifilm X-T3 a better choice

X-T3

NEX 3N

Sensor cleaning (3)
Wider resolution (5, megapixel)26.1016.10
Higher speed (4, frames/second)203
Auto Focus points (4)42525
Better monitor (2, Megapixel)1.040.46
Touch screen (2)
Better Video (2)3840 x 21601920 x 1080
External microphone (2)
WiFi (2)
USB 3.0 (2)
Environmental sealing (2)

Conclusion: Advantages of the X-T3 are built-in automatic sensor cleaning, the higher resolution and that the camera is faster. Additional pros for the Fujifilm are the faster and more accurate auto focus, that the display has a higher resolution and the rather comfortable touch screen. A recommendation of the X-T3 is made easy by the superior video recording, the connector for an external microphone and the built-in wifi that permits remote shooting and image transfer without the need for a cable connection. Finally, there's the the support for USB 3.0. HArdly a luxury, given today's image size and the requirements of 4K video.

The X-T3 scores 28 points.

Otherwise why to choose Sony NEX 3N

X-T3

NEX 3N

Better sensibility (4)160 - 12800 ISO200 - 16000 ISO
Larger lens selection (3)2550
Built-in flash (2)
Longer battery life (3, photos)390400
Weighs less (2)539g
(17.4 oz.)
210g
(6.8 oz.)
More portable (2)723cm³
(46 cu.in.)
243cm³
(15 cu.in.)

Conclusion: Advantages of the NEX 3N are the larger sensitivity, the larger selection of lenses and the built-in flash. A nice touch is that the battery has more stamina, the lower weight than the X-T3 and the more compact size.

Yields 16 points for the NEX 3N.

Common Specs for both cameras compared

X-T3

NEX 3N

Sensor formatAPS-CAPS-C
Articulated screen
Fujifilm X-T3 VS Sony NEX 3N Dimensions

Look at front view of the X-T3 and NEX 3N

X-T3 und NEX 3N, front viewX-T3 und NEX 3N, front view

Top view of cameras

X-T3 und NEX 3N, view from aboveX-T3 und NEX 3N, view from above

Total scores

Here's the total score according to comparison above:

Fujifilm X-T3

Sony NEX 3N

28
16

We recommend Fujifilm X-T3 as better choice.

Visual data, advantage info and scores © 2019 PalCamerasWest.com. All rights reserved.