Fujifilm X-T3 vs Sigma sd Quattro Compare

Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.

Cameras which are being compared are Mirrorless cameras.

X-T3 vs sd Quattro - Side by side

Learn more about compared cameras specifications below.

Fujifilm X-T3 vs Sigma sd Quattro Specs


  • Introduced in September 2018
  • Mirrorless
  • Sensor: APS-C
  • 26 megapixel
  • 20 frames/second
  • 160 - 12800 ISO
  • 3840 x 2160 Video
  • Viewfinder: Elektronic
  • 76.00mm (3.0") Monitor, articulated
  • Lens mount X-Bajonett
  • WiFi built-in
  • 132.5 x 92.8 x 58.8mm³ (5.2" x 3.7" x 2.3")
  • 539g (17.4 oz.)

All specs: Main page for X-T3

sd Quattro

  • Introduced in February 2016
  • Mirrorless
  • Sensor: APS-C
  • 29 megapixel
  • 3 frames/second
  • 100 - 6400 ISO
  • 0 Video
  • Viewfinder: Elektronic
  • 76.00mm (3.0") Monitor
  • Lens mount SA
  • No WiFi
  • 147 x 95.1 x 90.8mm³ (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
  • 625g (20.2 oz.)

All specs: Main page for sd Quattro

X-T3 vs sd Quattro Sensors

On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted.

This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats:

Info graphic: X-T3 an sd Quattro sensor comparison

X-T3 vs sd Quattro: Viewfinder

X-T3 has an electronic viewfinder and it's resolution is 3.69 megapixel with magnification of 0.75x.

sd Quattro has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it's magnification is 0.69x.

Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x.

X-T3 (0.75x)

sd Quattro (0.69x)

Simulated viewfinder of the X-T3Simulated viewfinder of the sd Quattro

Better choice: Fujifilm X-T3

Fujifilm X-T3 VS Sigma sd Quattro Other Specs Comparison

Why is Fujifilm X-T3 a better choice


sd Quattro

Sensor cleaning (3)
Higher speed (4, frames/second)203
Auto Focus points (4)4259
Better sensibility (4)160 - 12800 ISO100 - 6400 ISO
Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel)3.692.36
Larger lens selection (3)25
Articulated monitor (2)
Touch screen (2)
Better Video (2)3840 x 21600
External microphone (2)
Longer battery life (3, photos)390300
Weighs less (2)539g
(17.4 oz.)
(20.2 oz.)
More portable (2)723cm³
(46 cu.in.)
(80 cu.in.)
WiFi (2)
Environmental sealing (2)

Conclusion: Advantages of the X-T3 are built-in automatic sensor cleaning, that the camera is faster and the faster and more accurate auto focus. Additional pros for the Fujifilm are the larger sensitivity, the better viewfinder and the larger selection of lenses. We also like the articulated display, the rather comfortable touch screen and the superior video recording. A recommendation of the X-T3 is made easy by the connector for an external microphone, that the battery has more stamina and the lower weight than the sd Quattro. Another advantage over the sd Quattro: the more compact size, the built-in wifi that permits remote shooting and image transfer without the need for a cable connection.

The X-T3 scores 39 points.

Otherwise why to choose Sigma sd Quattro


sd Quattro

Wider resolution (5, megapixel)26.1029.00
Better monitor (2, Megapixel)1.041.62

Conclusion: Advantages of the sd Quattro are the higher resolution and that the display has a higher resolution.

Yields 7 points for the sd Quattro.

Common Specs for both cameras compared


sd Quattro

Sensor formatAPS-CAPS-C
Fujifilm X-T3 VS Sigma sd Quattro Dimensions

Look at front view of the X-T3 and sd Quattro

X-T3 und sd Quattro, front viewX-T3 und sd Quattro, front view

Top view of cameras

X-T3 und sd Quattro, view from aboveX-T3 und sd Quattro, view from above

Total scores

Here's the total score according to comparison above:

Fujifilm X-T3

Sigma sd Quattro


We recommend Fujifilm X-T3 as better choice.

Visual data, advantage info and scores © 2019 PalCamerasWest.com. All rights reserved.