Fujifilm GFX 50R vs Sony NEX 3N Compare

Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.

Cameras which are being compared are Mirrorless cameras.

GFX 50R vs NEX 3N - Side by side

Learn more about compared cameras specifications below.

Fujifilm GFX 50R vs Sony NEX 3N Specs


  • Introduced in September 2018
  • Mirrorless
  • Sensor: Medium format
  • 51 megapixel
  • 3 frames/second
  • 100 - 12800 ISO
  • 1920 x 1080 Video
  • Viewfinder: Elektronic
  • 81.00mm (3.2") Monitor, articulated
  • Lens mount G-Bajonett
  • WiFi built-in
  • 160.7 x 96.5 x 66.4mm³ (6.3" x 3.8" x 2.6")
  • 775g (25.0 oz.)

All specs: Main page for GFX 50R


  • Introduced in February 2013
  • Mirrorless
  • Sensor: APS-C
  • 16 megapixel
  • 3 frames/second
  • 200 - 16000 ISO
  • 1920 x 1080 Video
  • No viewfinder
  • 75.00mm (3.0") Monitor, articulated
  • Lens mount E Mount
  • No WiFi
  • 109.6 x 62.0 x 35.7mm³ (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4")
  • 210g (6.8 oz.)

All specs: Main page for NEX 3N

GFX 50R vs NEX 3N Sensors

On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted.

This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats:

Infographic: GFX 50R and NEX 3N sensor area comparison

Better choice: Fujifilm GFX 50R

Fujifilm GFX 50R VS Sony NEX 3N Other Specs Comparison

Why is Fujifilm GFX 50R a better choice



Larger sensor (5)Medium formatAPS-C
Sensor cleaning (3)
Wider resolution (5, megapixel)51.4016.10
Auto Focus points (4)11725
Better monitor (2, Megapixel)2.360.46
Touch screen (2)
External microphone (2)
WiFi (2)
USB 3.0 (2)

Conclusion: Advantages of the GFX 50R are the larger sensor, built-in automatic sensor cleaning and the higher resolution. Additional pros for the Fujifilm are the faster and more accurate auto focus, that the display has a higher resolution and the rather comfortable touch screen. A recommendation of the GFX 50R is made easy by the connector for an external microphone, the built-in wifi that permits remote shooting and image transfer without the need for a cable connection and the support for USB 3.0. HArdly a luxury, given today's image size and the requirements of 4K video.

The GFX 50R scores 27 points.

Otherwise why to choose Sony NEX 3N



Better sensibility (4)100 - 12800 ISO200 - 16000 ISO
Larger lens selection (3)550
Built-in flash (2)
Weighs less (2)775g
(25.0 oz.)
(6.8 oz.)
More portable (2)1030cm³
(65 cu.in.)
(15 cu.in.)

Conclusion: Advantages of the NEX 3N are the larger sensitivity, the larger selection of lenses and the built-in flash. A nice touch is the lower weight than the GFX 50R and the more compact size.

Yields 13 points for the NEX 3N.

Common Specs for both cameras compared



Speed (frames/second)33
Articulated screen
Video resolution1920 x 10801920 x 1080
Fujifilm GFX 50R VS Sony NEX 3N Dimensions

Look at front view of the GFX 50R and NEX 3N

GFX 50R und NEX 3N, front viewGFX 50R und NEX 3N, front view

Top view of cameras

GFX 50R und NEX 3N, view from aboveGFX 50R und NEX 3N, view from above

Total scores

Here's the total score according to comparison above:

Fujifilm GFX 50R

Sony NEX 3N


We recommend Fujifilm GFX 50R as better choice.

Visual data, advantage info and scores © 2019 PalCamerasWest.com. All rights reserved.