Canon PowerShot SX540 HS vs Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Compare

Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.

Cameras which are being compared are Superzoom cameras.

PowerShot SX540 HS vs DMC FZ2000 - Side by side

Learn more about compared cameras specifications below.

Canon PowerShot SX540 HS vs Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Specs

PowerShot SX540 HS

  • Introduced in January 2016
  • Superzoom
  • Sensor: Compact
  • 20 megapixel
  • 6 frames/second
  • 100 - 3200 ISO
  • 1920 x 1080 Video
  • No viewfinder
  • 75.00mm (3.0") Monitor
  • Zoom 24-1200mm (50x), f3.4-6.5
  • WiFi built-in
  • 120.0 x 81.7 x 91.9mm³ (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6")
  • 442g (14.3 oz.)

All specs: Main page for PowerShot SX540 HS

DMC FZ2000

  • Introduced in September 2016
  • Superzoom
  • Sensor: 1"
  • 20 megapixel
  • 12 frames/second
  • 125 - 12800 ISO
  • 4096 x 2160 Video
  • Viewfinder: Elektronic
  • 75.00mm (3.0") Monitor, articulated
  • Zoom 24-480mm (20x), f2.8-4.5
  • WiFi built-in
  • 137.6 x 101.9 x 134.7mm³ (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3")
  • 966g (31.2 oz.)

All specs: Main page for DMC FZ2000

PowerShot SX540 HS vs DMC FZ2000: The sensors

The PowerShot SX540 HS features a Compact sized sensor, while the DMC FZ2000 uses a 1" sensor.

Featuring an area of 116mm² (0.19 sq.in.), the DMC FZ2000's sensor is a lot larger that the chip that the PowerShot SX540 HS employs at 28mm² (0.04 sq.in.). A larger sensor can produce images of interiors or at night that have less noise and better contrast than photos shot with Compact sized chips.

Better choice: Panasonic DMC FZ2000

Canon PowerShot SX540 HS VS Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Other Specs Comparison

Why is Canon PowerShot SX540 HS a better choice

PowerShot SX540 HS

DMC FZ2000

Wider resolution (5, megapixel)20.3020.10
Weighs less (2)442g
(14.3 oz.)
966g
(31.2 oz.)
More portable (2)901cm³
(57 cu.in.)
1889cm³
(119 cu.in.)

Conclusion: Advantages of the PowerShot SX540 HS are the higher resolution, the lower weight than the DMC FZ2000 and the more compact size.

The PowerShot SX540 HS scores 9 points.

Otherwise why to choose Panasonic DMC FZ2000

PowerShot SX540 HS

DMC FZ2000

Larger sensor (5)Compact1"
Higher speed (4, frames/second)612
Auto Focus points (4)949
Better sensibility (4)100 - 3200 ISO125 - 12800 ISO
Better monitor (2, Megapixel)0.461.04
Articulated monitor (2)
Touch screen (2)
Better Video (2)1920 x 10804096 x 2160
External microphone (2)
Longer battery life (3, photos)205350

Conclusion: Advantages of the DMC FZ2000 are the larger sensor, that the camera is faster and the faster and more accurate auto focus. Additional pros for the Panasonic are the larger sensitivity, that the display has a higher resolution and the articulated display. A recommendation of the DMC FZ2000 is made easy by the rather comfortable touch screen, the superior video recording and the connector for an external microphone. Another advantage over the PowerShot SX540 HS: that the battery has more stamina.

Yields 30 points for the DMC FZ2000.

Common Specs for both cameras compared

PowerShot SX540 HS

DMC FZ2000

Built-in flash
Image stabilizer
WiFi
Canon PowerShot SX540 HS VS Panasonic DMC FZ2000 Dimensions

Look at front view of the PowerShot SX540 HS and DMC FZ2000

PowerShot SX540 HS und DMC FZ2000, front viewPowerShot SX540 HS und DMC FZ2000, front view

Top view of cameras

PowerShot SX540 HS und DMC FZ2000, view from abovePowerShot SX540 HS und DMC FZ2000, view from above

Total scores

Here's the total score according to comparison above:

Canon PowerShot SX540 HS

Panasonic DMC FZ2000

9
30

We recommend Panasonic DMC FZ2000 as better choice.

Visual data, advantage info and scores © 2019 PalCamerasWest.com. All rights reserved.