Canon EOS R vs Sigma sd Quattro Compare

Here you can find digital cameras comparison. Pick up with the best rating.

Cameras which are being compared are Mirrorless cameras.

EOS R vs sd Quattro - Side by side

Learn more about compared cameras specifications below.

Canon EOS R vs Sigma sd Quattro Specs

EOS R

  • Introduced in September 2018
  • Mirrorless
  • Sensor: Full frame
  • 31 megapixel
  • 5 frames/second
  • 100 - 40000 ISO
  • 3840 x 2160 Video
  • Viewfinder: Elektronic
  • 80.00mm (3.1") Monitor, articulated
  • Lens mount R Mount
  • WiFi built-in
  • 135.8 x 98.3 x 84.4mm³ (5.3" x 3.9" x 3.3")
  • 660g (21.3 oz.)

All specs: Main page for EOS R

sd Quattro

  • Introduced in February 2016
  • Mirrorless
  • Sensor: APS-C
  • 29 megapixel
  • 3 frames/second
  • 100 - 6400 ISO
  • 0 Video
  • Viewfinder: Elektronic
  • 76.00mm (3.0") Monitor
  • Lens mount SA
  • No WiFi
  • 147 x 95.1 x 90.8mm³ (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
  • 625g (20.2 oz.)

All specs: Main page for sd Quattro

EOS R vs sd Quattro Sensors

On the pictures below the sensor areas of cameras are highlighted.

This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other common sensor formats:

Infographic: EOS R and sd Quattro sensor area comparison

Better choice: Canon EOS R

EOS R vs sd Quattro: Viewfinder

EOS R has an electronic viewfinder and it's resolution is 3.68 megapixel with magnification of 0.76x.

sd Quattro has an electronic viewfinder with resolution 2.36 megapixel, it's magnification is 0.69x.

Viewfinder magnifications of compared cameras. The black area shows a magnification of 1x, relative to native size; in red is a magnification of 0.85x.

EOS R (0.76x)

sd Quattro (0.69x)

Simulated viewfinder of the EOS RSimulated viewfinder of the sd Quattro

Advantage: Canon EOS R

Canon EOS R VS Sigma sd Quattro Other Specs Comparison

Why is Canon EOS R a better choice

EOS R

sd Quattro

Larger sensor (5)Full frameAPS-C
Sensor cleaning (3)
Wider resolution (5, megapixel)31.3029.00
Higher speed (4, frames/second)53
Auto Focus points (4)59559
Better sensibility (4)100 - 40000 ISO100 - 6400 ISO
Better viewfinder (4, Megapixel)3.682.36
Larger lens selection (3)4
Better monitor (2, Megapixel)2.101.62
Articulated monitor (2)
Touch screen (2)
Better Video (2)3840 x 21600
External microphone (2)
Longer battery life (3, photos)370300
More portable (2)1127cm³
(71 cu.in.)
1269cm³
(80 cu.in.)
WiFi (2)
Environmental sealing (2)

Conclusion: Advantages of the EOS R are the larger sensor, built-in automatic sensor cleaning and the higher resolution. Additional pros for the Canon are that the camera is faster, the faster and more accurate auto focus and the larger sensitivity. We also like the better viewfinder, the larger selection of lenses and that the display has a higher resolution. A nice touch is the articulated display, the rather comfortable touch screen and the superior video recording. A recommendation of the EOS R is made easy by the connector for an external microphone, that the battery has more stamina and the more compact size. Finally, there's the the built-in wifi that permits remote shooting and image transfer without the need for a cable connection.

The EOS R scores 49 points.

Otherwise why to choose Sigma sd Quattro

No advantage for the Sigma sd Quattro compared to Canon EOS R

Common Specs for both cameras compared

EOS R

sd Quattro

Similar weight660g625g
Canon EOS R VS Sigma sd Quattro Dimensions

Look at front view of the EOS R and sd Quattro

EOS R und sd Quattro, front viewEOS R und sd Quattro, front view

Top view of cameras

EOS R und sd Quattro, view from aboveEOS R und sd Quattro, view from above

Total scores

Here's the total score according to comparison above:

Canon EOS R

Sigma sd Quattro

49
0

We recommend Canon EOS R as better choice.

Visual data, advantage info and scores © 2019 PalCamerasWest.com. All rights reserved.